Short Answer
When It Makes Sense
- Good fit: you want to experience the series from the beginning. Octopath Traveler introduced the HD-2D visual style, the break-and-boost combat system, and the eight-traveler structure that its sequel refines. Playing it first gives you a clear sense of how the mechanics, presentation, and storytelling evolved into Octopath Traveler II. If you enjoy tracing a franchise’s progression, the original is a natural starting point.
- Good fit: you have time for two lengthy JRPGs. Both games are substantial, standalone adventures with dozens of hours of exploration, side quests, and optional bosses. If your schedule allows for two long campaigns and you want maximum value from the series, starting with the first game extends the overall experience and lets you carry your familiarity with systems into the sequel.
- Good fit: you found the first game at a lower price. Because Octopath Traveler has been available longer, it is frequently discounted in digital sales or available secondhand at a reduced cost. If budget matters, beginning with the cheaper title is a low-risk way to test whether the series’ slow-paced, retro-styled combat and structure appeal to you before paying full price for the newer release.
- Good fit: you prefer non-linear, anthology-style storytelling. The first game tells eight largely independent tales that you can tackle in almost any order. If you like choosing your own path and piecing together lore across separate arcs, the original’s structure may feel like a feature rather than a flaw.
When You Should Avoid It
- Warning sign: you have limited time and only want one JRPG. If you can commit to only one game, Octopath Traveler II is generally the more polished package. Its quality-of-life improvements, day-night cycle, and more connected party interactions make it a stronger first impression. Playing the older game first could use up the time or energy you intended for the sequel.
- Warning sign: modern convenience matters more to you than nostalgia. The original lacks several refinements found in the sequel, such as seamless day-night transitions, improved path-action variety, and more flexible character customization. Players who are sensitive to dated interfaces, slower traversal, or grindier moments may find the first game harder to enjoy after experiencing modern JRPG conveniences.
- Warning sign: you dislike fragmented narratives. Although both games use eight protagonists, the first game’s stories are more loosely connected and the characters rarely interact outside of optional travel banter. If you want a tightly woven plot with strong cross-party dynamics, starting with the sequel may be more satisfying.
- Warning sign: you are worried about franchise fatigue. The two games share a very similar structure, art style, and combat loop. Playing them back-to-back can make the second feel overly familiar. If repetition burns you out, consider spacing them out or choosing only the entry that best fits your taste.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Clear series foundation. Starting with Octopath Traveler helps you understand the design philosophy behind the break-and-boost system, job mechanics, and multi-story format. That background makes the sequel’s refinements easier to appreciate.
- Lower entry cost. Because the first game has been available longer, it is often cheaper. You can test the series without paying a premium, which is useful if you are unsure about the genre or the HD-2D aesthetic.
- Standalone and safe to play in any order. The stories are not directly connected, so there is no risk of spoilers or confusion if you begin with the original. You can also stop after the first game and still have a complete narrative experience.
Cons
- Older design and less polish. The first game has rougher pacing, less refined path actions, and fewer narrative links between party members. Some players find the structure repetitive or the eight tales too disconnected to stay engaged.
- Opportunity cost of time and money. JRPGs of this style require a significant time investment. If your goal is to play only the best version of the concept, pouring hours into the older game may delay or replace your experience with the more polished sequel.
- Risk of burnout before the sequel. Because the games are structurally similar, finishing the first game and immediately starting the second can make the sequel feel less fresh, reducing the impact of its improvements.
Decision Checklist
- Do I want to play both games, or am I really looking for the single best entry point?
- Am I comfortable with older JRPG pacing and fewer quality-of-life features?
- Is the first game available at a price that makes it an easy experiment?
- Do I prefer anthology-style stories, or do I want stronger connections between party members?
- Can I take a break between the two games to avoid fatigue?
- Have I tried the free demos for either game to see if the combat and visuals appeal to me?
Alternatives to Consider
If you are unsure about committing to the first game, there are several lower-risk paths. You can start with Octopath Traveler II and return to the original later if you still want more. You can download the free demo available for either title on most platforms to test the combat, visuals, and pacing before buying. If you are mainly curious about the developer’s style but want a different structure, consider other Square Enix HD-2D titles such as Triangle Strategy or Bravely Default II, which share some DNA but offer different gameplay focuses. Finally, if you only want the story highlights of the first game, watching a spoiler-free overview or a narrative-focused playthrough may give you enough context without a full playthrough.
Final Recommendation
If you have the time, enjoy classic turn-based JRPGs, and found Octopath Traveler at a comfortable price, playing it first is a reasonable and enjoyable path. It introduces the series’ core systems and lets you appreciate the sequel’s improvements. However, if you can only play one game, prefer modern polish, or are worried about fatigue, start with Octopath Traveler II and treat the first game as an optional prequel. The two stories are independent, so either order works. For the best fit, try the free demos and check current pricing before making your purchase.
FAQ
Should I play Octopath Traveler 1 before 2?
Not necessarily. The games have unrelated stories and different casts, so either can be played first. Start with the first game if you want to follow the series' evolution and can commit to two long JRPGs; start with the second if you want the most polished modern experience or only have time for one.
What should I consider before I play Octopath Traveler 1 before 2?
Consider your available time, budget, tolerance for older JRPG mechanics, and whether you prefer a more polished, connected sequel or an anthology-style original. Also try the free demos, compare current prices, and decide if you are likely to play both games or stop after one.
Will I miss story details if I skip Octopath Traveler 1?
No. Octopath Traveler 2 is set in a different world with new characters. There are thematic and mechanical callbacks, but the main plot does not depend on events from the first game.
Leave a Reply