Short Answer
When It Makes Sense
- Good fit: You want the fullest possible narrative continuity. The Witcher trilogy follows Geralt of Rivia across a single political and personal saga. Characters such as Triss Merigold, Dandelion, Zoltan Chivay, and several kings and sorceresses recur across all three games. Playing the first two titles gives earlier context for relationships, grudges, and diplomatic fallout that are referenced repeatedly in The Witcher 3.
- Good fit: You genuinely enjoy older Western RPGs and do not mind dated visuals, slower pacing, or idiosyncratic combat. The Witcher 1 (2007) uses a rhythmic click-based combat system and chapter-based exploration rather than open-world traversal. The Witcher 2 (2011) is more modern but still has quirks such as narrow level design and a steep difficulty curve at launch. Players who like retro CRPGs or immersive sims often find both games rewarding.
When You Should Avoid It
- Warning sign: You have limited gaming time or a long backlog. The Witcher 1 can take 40–60 hours for a thorough playthrough, and The Witcher 2 can take 25–40 hours. Together that is roughly 65–100 hours before you even begin The Witcher 3, which itself can exceed 100 hours with its two major expansions. If your goal is simply to experience the widely praised third entry, the older games may delay or derail that plan.
- Warning sign: You are sensitive to dated mechanics, clunky user interfaces, or rough early-3D graphics. The Witcher 1 in particular shows its age in character models, voice acting, quest design, and inventory management. Starting there and disliking it can create franchise fatigue before you reach the game you were most excited about.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Emotional investment in recurring characters: Seeing relationships develop across three games can make reunions, betrayals, and deaths in The Witcher 3 land more powerfully. You will recognize references to past events and understand why certain characters trust or distrust Geralt.
- Carryover choices matter in The Witcher 3: Decisions made in The Witcher 2—such as the fate of major political figures—can carry into The Witcher 3 through save-file import or an in-game questionnaire at the start of The Witcher 3. Playing naturally lets you own those consequences rather than selecting them from a list.
Cons
- Significant time and money cost: You must purchase, install, and complete two older titles before reaching the main event. For busy players, that opportunity cost can be substantial, especially when The Witcher 3 alone offers a complete story.
- Dated gameplay that may feel like a barrier: The combat, quest structure, and presentation of the first two games do not match the polish of The Witcher 3. Some players abandon the series early because they start with the oldest entry rather than the most accessible one.
Decision Checklist
- How many hours can I realistically commit to the full trilogy, and am I willing to spend 65–100 hours on the first two games before starting The Witcher 3?
- Do I enjoy older RPGs with dated graphics and slower pacing, or do I strongly prefer modern open-world design and responsive combat?
- Is narrative continuity important to me, or would I be satisfied learning the backstory through recaps, books, or in-game glossaries?
Alternatives to Consider
If you are unsure about playing the first two games, several lower-commitment options exist. You can start with The Witcher 3 alone and use the opening in-game questionnaire to simulate key decisions from The Witcher 2. You can also read plot summaries, watch lore recaps on reputable video channels, or read the original Andrzej Sapkowski novels, which provide deeper world-building than the games themselves. Another option is to play The Witcher 2 but skip The Witcher 1, since The Witcher 2 is closer in tone and quality to the third entry and its choices carry over directly.
Final Recommendation
For most players who are curious about the franchise but have limited time, starting with The Witcher 3 is a reasonable and enjoyable entry point. It is a self-contained story with robust in-game context for major characters. If you finish The Witcher 3 and want more, you can revisit The Witcher 2 for a tighter narrative or The Witcher 1 for a vintage RPG experience. If you are a completionist, a fan of older CRPGs, or someone who values emotional continuity across a trilogy, playing The Witcher 1 and 2 first will enrich The Witcher 3—but it is not mandatory. Because this is a low-stakes entertainment decision, no professional consultation is needed; simply match the path to your available time and tolerance for dated design.
FAQ
Should I play Witcher 1 and 2 before 3?
It depends on your priorities. Playing them first deepens lore, character relationships, and carryover choices, but it is not required. The Witcher 3 is designed to stand on its own and includes tools to simulate earlier decisions.
What should I consider before playing Witcher 1 and 2 before 3?
Consider your available time, tolerance for dated graphics and combat, and how much narrative continuity matters. Alternatives include starting with The Witcher 3, using its questionnaire for Witcher 2 decisions, reading recaps, or reading the original novels.
Leave a Reply