Should I Play Red Dead 1 Before 2?

Short Answer

If you have a compatible console and want the story as originally released, playing Red Dead Redemption before Red Dead Redemption 2 makes sense. It preserves the original reveals and lets the prequel deepen characters you already know. However, RDR1’s older mechanics and lack of a native PC release can make it a poor starting point for players who prioritize modern polish or only game on PC. Your best order depends on hardware access and whether you value release-order storytelling over gameplay refinement.

When It Makes Sense

  • Good fit: You prefer to experience the series as it was originally released. Red Dead Redemption came out in 2010 and introduced the world, tone, and John Marston’s story first; playing it before the 2018 prequel lets you encounter plot points and characters in the order Rockstar originally presented them. RDR2 then acts as a detailed backstory that deepens figures such as Dutch van der Linde and John himself, often making its callbacks more meaningful if you already know where they end up.
  • Good fit: You have ready access to both games on compatible hardware and want the full saga from start to finish. If you own an Xbox 360, Xbox One/Series X|S via backward compatibility, PlayStation 3, or the PlayStation 4/Switch port, RDR1 is playable and offers a shorter, more focused campaign. Finishing it first can give you a clear narrative endpoint before you invest in the much larger, slower-paced open world of RDR2.

When You Should Avoid It

  • Warning sign: Modern controls, visuals, and polish are essential to your enjoyment. RDR1 is an older game: its shooting, horse handling, and world density are less refined than RDR2’s. If you start with the 2018 prequel and then go back, RDR1 may feel dated and harder to finish, even though its story remains strong.
  • Warning sign: You only play on PC or do not own a console that supports RDR1. RDR1 has no native Windows/PC release, while RDR2 is widely available on PC, PlayStation, and Xbox. In that case, forcing yourself to play RDR1 first may require extra hardware purchases or streaming subscriptions, making it impractical.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Release-order storytelling. Starting with RDR1 preserves the original narrative reveals and emotional beats. When you later play RDR2, you will recognize references, understand character histories, and appreciate how the prequel reshapes events you already know.
  • Lower commitment to start. RDR1’s campaign is shorter and more linear than RDR2’s sprawling story, so it can serve as an accessible introduction to the franchise’s themes and gameplay loop before you take on the larger sequel/prequel.

Cons

  • Dated mechanics and presentation. RDR1’s graphics, user interface, and gunplay reflect its era. After experiencing RDR2’s detailed world and smoother controls, returning to RDR1 can feel like a step backward and may reduce your motivation to see its story through.
  • Potential prequel-spoiler effect. RDR1 establishes the eventual fates and relationships of several characters that RDR2 builds toward. Knowing those outcomes can lessen the emotional impact of RDR2’s major story moments, which are designed to be experienced without that foreknowledge.

Decision Checklist

  • Do I have access to a console or platform that can run RDR1, or am I limited to PC where only RDR2 is natively available?
  • Is my priority the original release experience and story reveals, or do I prefer the most polished, modern gameplay first?
  • Am I willing to adjust to older controls and visuals, or would dated mechanics make it hard for me to finish a game?

Alternatives to Consider

If RDR1 first feels impractical, several other approaches work well. You can play Red Dead Redemption 2 first and then return to Red Dead Redemption to see how the story concludes chronologically. Another option is to watch a reputable story recap or “story so far” video for RDR1 before starting RDR2, giving you context without committing to older gameplay. If time or hardware is limited, you can also treat RDR2 as a standalone experience; its plot is self-contained and does not require RDR1 to follow Arthur Morgan’s journey. Finally, you could skip ahead to RDR1’s multiplayer or side content only if your main interest is the world rather than the main narrative.

Final Recommendation

For players who own compatible hardware and value the intended release experience, starting with Red Dead Redemption before Red Dead Redemption 2 is a sound path: it preserves the original storytelling and lets the prequel deepen characters you already know. If you primarily play on PC, strongly prefer modern gameplay, or are unsure about older mechanics, start with Red Dead Redemption 2 instead; you can return to RDR1 later or catch up through a story recap. Either order can deliver a memorable experience, so choose based on your platform and tolerance for dated design rather than a rigid rule.

FAQ

Should I play Red Dead 1 before 2?

It depends on your platform and priorities. If you have a console that runs RDR1 and want the story as originally released, starting with RDR1 is reasonable. If you play mainly on PC or prefer modern gameplay, start with RDR2 and return to RDR1 later or use a story recap.

What should I consider before I choose the play order?

Check whether your hardware can run RDR1, decide if you value release-order reveals or polished modern controls, and consider whether older graphics and mechanics might put you off. If you are unsure, RDR2 works well as a standalone experience.

References

  1. Rockstar Games official Red Dead Redemption pages (rockstargames.com)
  2. IGN Red Dead Redemption franchise guides (ign.com)

Related Terms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *