Should I Play Dark Souls In Order?

Short Answer

Playing the Dark Souls trilogy in release order makes sense if you value connected lore, mechanical evolution, and the intended pacing of callbacks. It is less ideal if your time is limited, you prefer modern controls, or you only want a single memorable action-RPG. Consider your priorities, available time, and tolerance for older systems before committing to the full sequence.

When It Makes Sense

  • Good fit: You want the trilogy’s lore, atmosphere, and recurring imagery to accumulate naturally. Dark Souls, Dark Souls II, and Dark Souls III share a universe built on cyclical ages, fading fire, and crumbling kingdoms. Although each story is largely self-contained, later games reference earlier events through item descriptions, returning locations, enemy designs, and environmental callbacks. Playing in release order means those references land with the intended weight: you will recognize why a ruined cathedral feels tragic, or why a familiar name carries history. If piecing together fragmented mythology is part of the appeal for you, beginning with Dark Souls Remastered and moving forward is the most coherent path.
  • Good fit: You are curious about how FromSoftware’s action-RPG design changed across a decade. Each entry experiments with stamina costs, build variety, online invasions, level layout, and boss spectacle. The original Dark Souls emphasizes slow, deliberate exploration and tightly connected map design; Dark Souls II expands character customization and introduces power stancing along with its own melancholic tone; Dark Souls III streamlines movement, adds faster combat, and ties together visual motifs from the whole series. Experiencing them in sequence lets you notice why a mechanic was added, removed, or refined, turning the trilogy into a kind of playable design history lesson.

When You Should Avoid It

  • Warning sign: You have limited gaming time and are mainly looking for one standout adventure. Each game is a substantial action RPG that can take dozens of hours to complete, and the difficulty curve means progress is rarely quick. Committing to the full trilogy in order means accepting long stretches of repetition: similar enemy ambushes, cryptic quest lines, and punishing boss encounters across three connected but separate worlds. If you suspect you will only finish one entry anyway, forcing yourself to start with the oldest game may lead to burnout before you ever reach the title you would have loved most.
  • Warning sign: Modern responsiveness, user interface polish, and graphical fidelity strongly influence your enjoyment. Dark Souls Remastered improved performance over the original, yet it still retains deliberately measured animations, rigid jump physics, and occasional hit-detection inconsistencies. Dark Souls II uses a different engine and animation set that some players find stiff or disconnected. If you are the kind of gamer who is quickly frustrated by dated controls, limited fast travel early on, or opaque systems, playing in chronological order may create more friction than fun. You may be better served by a newer entry or another action RPG entirely.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Narrative and thematic payoff: following the trilogy in release order reveals callbacks, item descriptions, and environmental storytelling that are harder to appreciate in isolation. You will understand why certain locations feel significant and how later games reinterpret earlier ideas, giving the series a cumulative emotional impact.
  • Skill and system progression: learning the slower, punishing rhythm of the first game can build the patience and pattern-recognition habits that later entries reward. By the time you reach Dark Souls III, parries, dodge timing, stamina discipline, and build planning should feel more natural, making the eventual climax smoother to navigate.

Cons

  • Time and pacing fatigue: the three main games are large, and the series’ difficulty means progress is often slow. Playing them back-to-back can make similar combat rhythms, interconnected environments, and cryptic storytelling feel repetitive rather than fresh, especially if you attempt them consecutively without a break.
  • Quality-of-life regression: returning to earlier entries after experiencing modern conveniences can be jarring. Bonfire warp limitations, equipment durability, slower travel, and less polished camera behavior in older games may feel like unnecessary friction compared with later FromSoftware releases, even if those design choices were intentional.

Decision Checklist

  • What do I want most from the experience—lore continuity, mechanical challenge, a single memorable adventure, or a modern action-RPG feel? Your priority will determine whether release order, a later entry, or another franchise is the best fit.
  • How much time can I realistically commit? Completing one game can take dozens of hours; the full trilogy can stretch across months. Be honest about whether you are likely to finish the series or abandon it halfway.
  • Am I comfortable with older game design and the possibility of needing community guides? The early games are less explicit about mechanics and progression, and some platform-specific performance issues may require patches or mods. If you dislike that kind of friction, consider starting with a newer game or a more guided action RPG.

Alternatives to Consider

If strict order feels like too much commitment, start with the game whose premise, setting, or speed excites you most. Dark Souls III is more accessible and visually polished while still honoring the trilogy; Bloodborne rewards aggressive, faster combat in a horror-fantasy world; Elden Ring offers an open-world take on similar systems with more freedom and modern conveniences. You can also treat the trilogy as standalone experiences: each game tells a mostly self-contained story, so skipping Dark Souls II, for example, will not prevent you from enjoying Dark Souls III. Another option is to watch a concise, reputable lore summary of the first game and then jump into a later entry, preserving context without dozens of hours of gameplay.

Final Recommendation

Play the trilogy in release order if you care about lore continuity, want to watch FromSoftware’s design evolve, and have the patience for older systems. A practical path is Dark Souls Remastered, then Dark Souls II: Scholar of the First Sin, then Dark Souls III, treating Demon’s Souls as an optional precursor because it occupies a separate world. If you are unsure about the older games, start with Dark Souls III or Elden Ring to see whether the style suits you, then backtrack if you want more. For significant purchase, time, or platform decisions, check official store listings and system requirements before buying. This is a low-stakes entertainment choice, but if any underlying health or financial concern affects your gaming habits, consult an appropriate professional.

FAQ

Should I play Dark Souls in order?

It depends on your goals. Release order is best for lore continuity and seeing how the games evolved mechanically. If you have limited time or prefer modern controls, starting with a later entry such as Dark Souls III or Elden Ring may be more enjoyable.

What should I consider before I play Dark Souls in order?

Think about how much time you can commit, whether you enjoy older game design, and what you want most from the experience. Also consider platform availability, system requirements, and whether you are comfortable using community guides when the games are unclear about mechanics.

References

  1. Bandai Namco Entertainment - Dark Souls series official product pages
  2. FromSoftware official website
  3. Steam store pages for Dark Souls Remastered, Dark Souls II: Scholar of the First Sin, and Dark Souls III

Related Terms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *